Selected Engagements

Anonymized by commitment.

Client names do not appear here and will not. Discretion is a term of the engagement, not a courtesy. References are available on request.

Engagement I · Youth Development · California

Declined twice on the same federal grant. Funded on the third.

The situation

A multiyear federal education grant, twice declined, with no useful feedback returned either time.

The work

Restructured the needs narrative. Realigned the logic model to reviewer criteria. Rebuilt the budget sustainability section.

The outcome

Funded on the third submission.

Engagement II · Social Services · San Diego

Three letters of inquiry. Two advanced. One funded in full.

The situation

An organization applying to the same familiar funders with no map of who else was giving in their sector.

The work

Funder research and prospect mapping, then three calibrated letters of inquiry.

The outcome

Two advanced to full proposal. One private foundation funded in full with no prior relationship to the organization.

Engagement III · Founder Led · Social Services

Funded within three months of the realignment.

The situation

A founder of color receiving vague rejection feedback that named no correctable problem.

The work

Realigned the proposals to funder priorities and to the preferences those funders do not publish.

The outcome

Funded within three months.

Outcomes described here are drawn from completed engagements. No result is offered as a prediction. Grant outcomes are decided by funders, and no writer controls them.